Logitech G Pro X Superlight vs Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2
Side-by-side spec comparison and pro player usage.
G Pro X Superlight 2
- 60 g weight
- HERO 2 sensor
- Wireless
- $159.99
Full Spec Comparison
| Spec | Logitech G Pro X Superlight | Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 61 | 60 ✓ |
| Length | 125 | 125.9 |
| Width | 63.5 | 63.5 |
| Height | 40 | 40 |
| Sensor | HERO 25K | HERO 2 |
| Max DPI | 25600 | 32000 ✓ |
| Polling Rate (max) | 1000 | 1000 |
| Buttons | 5 | 5 |
| Connectivity | wireless_2.4ghz | wireless_2.4ghz |
| Battery Life | 70 | 95 ✓ |
| Shape | symmetrical | symmetrical |
| RGB | No | No |
| Feet Material | PTFE | PTFE |
| Price (USD) | 159.99 | 159.99 |
| Release Year | 2020 | 2023 |
✓ indicates better value where objectively comparable.
Pro Player Usage
G Pro X Superlight users (0)
No tracked pro players.
Introduction
The Logitech G Pro X Superlight was the mouse that defined an era. When it launched, it proved that a wireless mouse could be lighter, faster, and more reliable than wired alternatives. Professional players adopted it en masse. For years, it was the default recommendation for competitive FPS gaming — the mouse you bought if you wanted the best and did not want to think about it.
Then Logitech released the Superlight 2, and the question became unavoidable: is the upgrade worth it? The Superlight 2 brings a new HERO 2 sensor (888 IPS), LIGHTFORCE hybrid optical-mechanical switches, 3 grams less weight, and 15 additional hours of battery life. On paper, it is better in every measurable way. But the original Superlight is now available at significant discounts — $100-120 compared to the Superlight 2’s $140.
This comparison is uniquely personal. If you already own the original Superlight, should you upgrade? If you are buying your first high-end wireless mouse, which generation should you choose? The answers are different, and both matter.
Quick Verdict Table
| Category | Superlight (Gen 1) | Superlight 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 63g | 60g | Superlight 2 |
| Sensor | HERO 25K | HERO 2 (888 IPS) | Superlight 2 |
| Switches | Omron mechanical | LIGHTFORCE hybrid | Superlight 2 |
| Battery | 70h | 85h | Superlight 2 |
| Click Latency | ~2.5ms (with debounce) | 1.2ms | Superlight 2 |
| Shape | Symmetrical, 125x63.5x40mm | Symmetrical, 125x64x40mm | Nearly identical |
| Wireless | LIGHTSPEED | LIGHTSPEED | Tie |
| MSRP | $160 (discounted to $100-120) | $140 | Complex (see below) |
| POWERPLAY Support | Yes | Yes | Tie |
Shape & Ergonomics
Here is the most important fact in this comparison: the Superlight and Superlight 2 are essentially the same shape. The Superlight 2 is approximately 0.5mm wider, which is imperceptible in hand. The hump position, height, and overall profile are functionally identical. If you like the shape of one, you will like the shape of the other.
Both mice measure approximately 125mm in length, 63-64mm in width, and 40mm in height. This is a medium-sized symmetrical shell with a rear-positioned hump. The shape works best for:
- Claw grip: Hands 18-20cm. The rear hump supports the base of the palm while the lower front allows precise fingertip control. This is the sweet spot grip for this mouse.
- Palm grip: Hands 17-18.5cm. Larger hands will find the shell too flat for comfortable full-palm contact. Smaller hands fit well.
- Fingertip grip: Hands 20cm+. The shell is wide enough that lateral micro-adjustments require slightly more effort than a narrower mouse, but the low weight compensates.
The 3-gram weight difference (63g vs 60g) is subtle. You can feel it in a direct side-by-side comparison, but going from 63g to 60g does not fundamentally change how the mouse moves. Both are firmly in the “ultralight” category. If you found the original Superlight light enough, the Superlight 2 will not feel like a revelation in weight reduction.
The surfaces differ slightly. The Superlight 2 has a revised coating that some users report grips better during sweaty sessions. The original Superlight’s coating, while adequate, becomes slick faster under moisture. This is a minor but noticeable improvement if you game for extended periods.
Sensor & Tracking
The HERO 25K in the original Superlight was excellent at launch and remains very good. It tracks at up to 400 IPS, offers 25,600 DPI, and has zero smoothing at all DPI levels. For the vast majority of competitive players using 400-800 DPI on a cloth pad, the HERO 25K performs flawlessly.
The HERO 2 in the Superlight 2 is a generational leap. 888 IPS tracking speed — more than double the HERO 25K. 44,000 DPI capability. Improved power efficiency that contributes to the longer battery life despite a lighter (smaller battery) design. The HERO 2 also features improved polling rate stability, with more consistent 1ms intervals.
Does this matter in practice? For most players, honestly — no. The HERO 25K does not spin out during normal gameplay. The HERO 2’s 888 IPS ceiling is relevant only for players who make extremely fast mouse movements, typically those playing at very low sensitivity with large mouse pads. If you play at 400 DPI and occasionally make rapid 180-degree turns, the HERO 2 provides additional tracking headroom that the HERO 25K lacks.
Where the HERO 2 makes a more noticeable difference is in lift-off distance consistency. The HERO 2 maintains more precise tracking behavior as the mouse is lifted and replaced on the pad. During fast mouse-lifting repositioning movements (common in low-sensitivity tac-shooter play), the HERO 2 provides slightly cleaner tracking during the lift-and-reset cycle. This is a subtle improvement, but experienced players notice it.
Build Quality & Switches
This is the category that most clearly justifies the Superlight 2’s existence. The original Superlight uses Omron mechanical switches with debounce processing. Click latency measures approximately 2.5ms. The click feel is soft, with a somewhat mushy return stroke that many players criticize. The double-click issue, while addressed through firmware and debounce tuning, remained a concern throughout the original Superlight’s lifecycle. Some units developed double-clicking after 12-18 months of heavy use.
The Superlight 2 uses LIGHTFORCE hybrid optical-mechanical switches. These combine the tactile click feel of a mechanical switch with the zero-debounce speed of an optical switch. Click latency drops to approximately 1.2ms — more than twice as fast as the original. The click feel is sharper, crisper, and more defined. The mushy return stroke is gone. The double-click issue is eliminated entirely because optical switches do not suffer from contact bounce.
Let me state this directly: the LIGHTFORCE switches are the single biggest improvement in the Superlight 2. If you own the original Superlight and have ever been frustrated by the soft clicks, the mushy return, or anxiety about developing double-clicking, the Superlight 2’s switches alone make a compelling upgrade case. The difference is immediately obvious from the first click.
Build quality is excellent on both mice. Neither exhibits shell flex or creaking. The Superlight 2’s internal construction is slightly refined — the battery mounting is more secure and the internals are cleaner — but externally, both mice feel premium and well-made. Scroll wheels are similar: light, clearly stepped, with a defined middle-click.
Battery & Wireless
The original Superlight delivers 70 hours of battery life. The Superlight 2 delivers 85 hours. Both are excellent. The 15-hour improvement means roughly 2-3 additional days between charges at typical usage patterns. This is a nice-to-have improvement rather than a transformative one.
Both mice use Logitech’s LIGHTSPEED wireless protocol. The Superlight 2’s implementation is marginally refined with more consistent polling intervals, but the practical difference in latency is sub-millisecond. Both mice perform as well as wired alternatives in competitive play.
Both mice support POWERPLAY wireless charging. If you own a POWERPLAY mat, the battery life specification becomes irrelevant — both mice stay perpetually charged. This is one of Logitech’s most underrated features for players who want to eliminate charging entirely.
Both charge via USB-C. Charging time is approximately 1.5 hours from empty for both models. A quick 15-minute charge provides enough power for a full gaming session on both.
The wireless receiver has been updated in the Superlight 2 to be smaller and more flush when inserted in a laptop port. This is a minor improvement that matters for portable use.
Software
Both mice use Logitech G HUB. The software experience is identical. DPI configuration, polling rate, button mapping, and POWERPLAY settings are all managed through the same interface. G HUB is functional but heavier than it needs to be — animated menus, occasional sluggishness, and promotional banners for other Logitech products.
The recommended workflow is the same for both: configure settings, save to onboard memory (5 profiles on the Superlight 2, 5 on the original), and uninstall G HUB. Both mice store complete profiles including DPI stages, button assignments, and report rate.
There is no software advantage for either mouse. This category is a complete tie.
Price & Value
This is the most nuanced category in the comparison. The Superlight 2 has an MSRP of $140 / ¥22,000. The original Superlight had an MSRP of $160 but is now widely available for $100-120 as retailers clear inventory and Logitech has effectively discounted the older model.
At $100, the original Superlight is an extraordinary value. You are getting a mouse that was the undisputed competitive standard for years at a 37% discount. The HERO 25K sensor, LIGHTSPEED wireless, and 63-gram weight remain competitive with anything on the market. The only meaningful weakness is the Omron switches — softer clicks, higher latency, and the lingering double-click concern.
At $140, the Superlight 2 is a fair price for a flagship wireless mouse. You are getting the best sensor, best switches, and lightest weight in Logitech’s lineup. It is not a bargain, but it is competitively priced against alternatives like the Razer Viper V3 HyperSpeed and Finalmouse Starlight-12.
The $20-40 price difference between the discounted original and the Superlight 2 is the core decision. Is the HERO 2 sensor, LIGHTFORCE switches, 3g weight reduction, and 15h additional battery worth $20-40? For most competitive players, I believe the answer is yes. The LIGHTFORCE switches alone represent a meaningful upgrade in click quality and reliability.
In the Japanese market, the calculus is different. At ¥22,000, the Superlight 2 is expensive. If you can find the original Superlight at ¥14,000-16,000 (approximately), the value gap becomes harder to ignore.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the Logitech G Pro X Superlight (Gen 1) if:
- Budget is the primary concern and you can find it at $100-120
- You are a casual competitive player who does not need the absolute fastest click latency
- You already own one and it is working well — do not upgrade for marginal gains
- You prefer a slightly heavier mouse feel (63g vs 60g is minimal, but some players prefer it)
- You are buying in Japan and the yen price difference is significant
- You want a proven mouse with years of professional validation at a discount
Buy the Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 if:
- You are buying your first high-end wireless mouse and want the current best from Logitech
- Click latency and click quality matter to you (1.2ms vs 2.5ms is significant)
- You want zero risk of double-clicking issues (LIGHTFORCE optical eliminates this)
- You play at the highest competitive level where every millisecond of latency matters
- Your original Superlight has developed double-clicking or switch degradation
- You want the HERO 2 sensor’s improved tracking speed ceiling (888 IPS)
Do NOT upgrade from Gen 1 to Gen 2 if:
- Your original Superlight is working perfectly and you have no complaints
- You primarily play non-competitive or casual games
- The price difference exceeds $30 in your market
- You are satisfied with the original’s click feel and latency
Final Verdict
The Superlight 2 is objectively the better mouse. Better sensor, better switches, lighter weight, longer battery. There is no category where the original Superlight wins — only categories where the differences are small enough to be negligible.
But “objectively better” does not mean “universally worth buying.” If you own a functional original Superlight that you are happy with, the upgrade provides diminishing returns. The 3-gram weight reduction, 15-hour battery improvement, and sensor tracking ceiling increase are not transformative changes. The LIGHTFORCE switches are the only upgrade that materially changes the gaming experience — and even then, only if the original’s softer clicks bother you.
For new buyers, the recommendation is straightforward: buy the Superlight 2. At $140, it is $20 less than the original’s MSRP and better in every way. The discounted Gen 1 at $100-120 is a strong alternative if budget is tight, but the Superlight 2 is the mouse you should buy if you can afford the difference.
For existing Superlight owners, the recommendation depends on one question: are you experiencing double-clicking or dissatisfaction with your current switches? If yes, the Superlight 2 is a worthwhile upgrade. If no, keep your Gen 1 and wait for the Superlight 3. Your money is better spent elsewhere — a quality mouse pad, a 4K monitor, or an ergonomic desk setup will improve your gaming experience more than a 1.3ms click latency improvement.
The Superlight line remains the gold standard for competitive wireless mice. Whether you buy Gen 1 or Gen 2, you are getting one of the best gaming tools available. The generational improvements are real but incremental — evolution, not revolution. And that is fine. Sometimes the best thing a manufacturer can do is take something great and make it slightly greater.