Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 vs Razer Viper V3 Pro

Side-by-side spec comparison and pro player usage.

Logitech

G Pro X Superlight 2

  • 60 g weight
  • HERO 2 sensor
  • Wireless
  • $159.99
Used by: s1mple, ZywOo, device, aspas, Nadeshot, NICKMERCS, electronic, XANTARES, aceu
Razer

Viper V3 Pro

  • 54 g weight
  • Focus Pro 35K sensor
  • Wireless
  • $159.99
Used by: NiKo

Full Spec Comparison

Spec Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 Razer Viper V3 Pro
Weight 60 54
Length 125.9 128.7
Width 63.5 57.6
Height 40 37.8
Sensor HERO 2 Focus Pro 35K
Max DPI 32000 35000
Polling Rate (max) 1000 8000
Buttons 5 5
Connectivity wireless_2.4ghz wireless_2.4ghz
Battery Life 95 95
Shape symmetrical symmetrical
RGB No No
Feet Material PTFE PTFE
Price (USD) 159.99 159.99
Release Year 2023 2024

✓ indicates better value where objectively comparable.

Pro Player Usage

The Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 and Razer Viper V3 Pro are the two best wireless gaming mice available in 2024. The Superlight 2 costs $160 at 60g with the HERO 2 sensor (888 IPS), LIGHTFORCE switches, and the most pro-adopted shape in esports. The Viper V3 Pro costs $160 at 54g with the Focus Pro 36K Gen-2, Optical Gen-3 switches, and native 8kHz polling support. Same price, different philosophies. This is the matchup that defines the current competitive mouse landscape.

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
WeightViper V3 Pro54g vs 60g — 6g lighter
Shape (Versatility)Superlight 2More universally comfortable
Shape (Claw/Ftip)Viper V3 ProWider, flatter, better for aim grips
Sensor (IPS)Superlight 2HERO 2 (888 IPS) vs Focus Pro 36K (750 IPS)
Click LatencyViper V3 Pro0.9ms vs 1.2ms
Polling RateViper V3 ProUp to 8000Hz vs 2000Hz
BatteryViper V3 Pro~90h vs ~85h at 1kHz
SoftwareTieBoth comprehensive
Pro UsageSuperlight 2s1mple, ZywOo, NiKo, aspas, Bugha
PriceTieBoth $160
Best ForSL2: safe pick. V3 Pro: maximum performance

Shape & Ergonomics Deep Dive

The Superlight 2 measures 125 × 63.5 × 40mm at 60g. Classic G Pro symmetrical shape with a center-rear hump peaking at 40mm. The shape is the most used in professional esports — a testament to its versatility. Gentle curves, moderate width, no aggressive contours. It works for palm, claw, and fingertip without excelling at any single one.

The Viper V3 Pro measures approximately 127 × 64 × 38mm at 54g. Wider than the Superlight 2, flatter (38mm peak vs 40mm), with more defined side curves for pinch control. The shape is optimized for aggressive aim play — claw and fingertip grips where the mouse needs to respond to micro-movements instantly.

Palm grip (18–20cm hands): The Superlight 2 is better. Its 40mm hump provides more palm fill than the V3 Pro’s 38mm. The gentle curves guide the hand into a natural rest position. The V3 Pro’s flat top leaves a palm gap that makes sustained palm grip less comfortable.

Claw grip (17.5–19.5cm hands): The Viper V3 Pro is better. Its wider body provides a more stable pinch platform. The lower profile allows more aggressive finger positioning. The defined side curves give tactile feedback for grip pressure. At 54g, the V3 Pro is also more agile for rapid repositioning. The Superlight 2 works well for claw but its narrower body and taller hump push toward relaxed claw rather than aggressive claw.

Fingertip grip (17–19cm hands): The Viper V3 Pro is better. Lower profile, lighter weight, wider body for fingertip stability. Both mice work for fingertip, but the V3 Pro’s 54g makes it noticeably more responsive.

Shape verdict: The Superlight 2 is the jack-of-all-trades — good for everything, best for nothing specific. The V3 Pro is optimized for claw and fingertip. If you know your grip, the V3 Pro is likely better. If you don’t, or if you alternate grips, the Superlight 2 is safer.

Sensor & Tracking Performance

The Superlight 2’s HERO 2 sensor leads in raw IPS — 888 IPS vs 750 IPS for the Focus Pro 36K Gen-2. This means the HERO 2 can track faster flick speeds before losing tracking. In practice, very few players ever approach either sensor’s IPS limit during gameplay.

The Viper V3 Pro wins in polling rate — up to 8000Hz natively, vs the Superlight 2’s maximum of 2000Hz (via optional dongle). At 8kHz on a 360Hz monitor, the cursor updates 8x per frame instead of 2.8x, resulting in measurably smoother motion.

Click latency: Viper V3 Pro at 0.9ms vs Superlight 2 at 1.2ms. Both are among the fastest in any consumer mouse. The 0.3ms gap is below conscious perception but consistently measurable.

Both sensors achieve perfect CPI accuracy at competitive DPI. Both have adjustable LOD. Both support Motion Sync / frame-aligned input.

Total system latency (sensor to screen): The V3 Pro at 8kHz achieves approximately 2.5ms total. The Superlight 2 at 2kHz achieves approximately 3ms total. At 1kHz, both are approximately 3.5ms.

Sensor verdict: The V3 Pro wins on polling rate and click latency. The Superlight 2 wins on IPS. Overall, the V3 Pro’s 8kHz polling rate is a more practically impactful advantage than the Superlight 2’s higher IPS ceiling.

Build Quality & Switches

Both mice represent the pinnacle of build quality in gaming mice. Zero flex, excellent coatings, premium feel.

The Superlight 2’s LIGHTFORCE hybrid optical-mechanical switches combine the crisp feel of mechanical switches with the reliability of optical actuation — zero double-click risk, sharp tactile break. The click feel is universally praised as crisp and satisfying.

The V3 Pro’s Optical Gen-3 switches are pure optical — slightly lighter actuation force, sharper actuation point, marginally faster response. The click feel is lighter and crisper than LIGHTFORCE, which some prefer and others find too light.

Both mice have excellent matte coatings. The V3 Pro’s textured side grips are slightly more aggressive for sweat resistance. The Superlight 2’s soft-touch coating is smoother and more comfortable for extended sessions.

Scroll wheels: both adequate for gaming, neither exceptional.

Build verdict: Tied. Both are flagship quality with slightly different click feel preferences.

Battery & Wireless

The V3 Pro gets approximately 90 hours at 1000Hz. The Superlight 2 gets approximately 85 hours at 1000Hz. At higher polling rates, both batteries drain faster — the V3 Pro at 8kHz gets approximately 24 hours, the Superlight 2 at 2kHz gets approximately 45 hours.

The Superlight 2 is PowerPlay compatible for wireless charging. The V3 Pro supports Razer’s wireless charging dock (sold separately). Both charge via USB-C.

LIGHTSPEED and HyperSpeed both achieve sub-1ms wireless latency. Both are extensively tournament-tested. Neither has a reliability advantage.

Software & Customization

Both Synapse and G HUB are comprehensive gaming software suites. Synapse offers Asymmetric Cut-Off, 8kHz polling configuration, and Motion Sync tuning. G HUB offers PowerPlay configuration and Logitech ecosystem integration. Both support onboard memory profiles for tournament use.

Price & Value

Both cost $160. At the same price, the comparison becomes purely about performance and preference. The V3 Pro offers more technological advancement (8kHz, lighter weight, faster clicks) at the cost of shape versatility. The Superlight 2 offers the safest shape in competitive gaming with proven pro adoption at the cost of being technically second-best in measurable metrics.

Who Should Buy Which

Buy the Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 if:

Buy the Razer Viper V3 Pro if:

Final Verdict

The Viper V3 Pro is the technically superior mouse — lighter, faster clicks, higher polling rate. The Superlight 2 is the more universally appealing mouse — safer shape, more pro adoption, PowerPlay support. At $160 each, the decision comes down to grip style and priorities. Claw/fingertip players who value performance metrics should buy the V3 Pro. Palm grip players and those who value proven shape comfort should buy the Superlight 2. Both are outstanding. You can’t go wrong with either.